POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 7

HANNAH ARENDT

  • German Jew, fled to Paris, settled in the US
  • republican political philosopher, original, Ancient Greek influences
  • Origins of Totalitarianism (Nazism and Stalinism)
  • banality of evil via Eichmann - the mindless beurocrat
  • Human Condition: phenomenology of life as active
  • Jaspers and Heidegger
  • Life of the Mind - thinking, willing, judging
  • maintains difference between the public and private spheres, understanding them as different

Totalitarianism & Eichmann:

  • NS and Stalinism reducing pluralities; Eichmann who was smart, but never questioned what he was doing
  • he used stock phrases, cliches, never grasping reality, only representations of it
  • Officialese was the only language he spoke, a language of absolute, abstract representations
  • this is the effect of totalitarianism, humans as pure extensions of the state, disposable masses

Modernity:

  • mass society, beurocracy, anonymous labour, elite domination
  • World Alienation: the past (up until 20th century), loss of a common world
  • in modernity the political and public realm are gone, there’s only the individual private sphere
  • Ancient Greeks were active participants in the social, getting glory publically (we do so privately)
  • With Plato the public (Socrates’ trial) is ignored in favour of the private soul
  • THE SOCIAL emerged from the merge of private and public, where the private interests begin dominating the public ones

Theory of Action:

3 fundamental activities:
1. Labour [Animal Laborans]: only survival, food, no politics, barren existence
[all is sameness]
2. Work [Homo Faber]: producing beautiful things with a goal, but still privately
[individual subordinated to the product]
3. Action [Free Human Beings]: an expression of your ontological what-ness within a plurality of being (society)
[true uniqueness]

Action:

  • modernity is defined by its opposition (beurocracy, elitism, thoughtlessness)
  • action allows for a shared home with meaning, without it we are lost in pure subjectivity
  • what defines us is our natality: the original productive capacity to bring something into the world (same as Marx)
  • action and speech reveal who you are, rather than what you are
  • coordination of action via speech, language-based action, via action and speech we are something more than our pure physicality, we are a self

Polis:

  • organization of people via acting and speaking together
  • the space of appearance
  • town hall, workers’ councils, demonstrations, revolutions, protests

Totalitarianism:

  • destroys plurality, strips people of creativity, makes humans into Animal Laborans
  • removes thinking (Eichmann was thoughtless)
  • thinking dissolves fixed habits and destroys universals, letting us comprehend particulars
  • thinking produces a conscious
  • judging as the capacity to think as somebody else (‘enlarged mentality’)

No truth of right and wrong: this reduces the particular-grasping free mind to think only in universals

  • there is, of course, factual truth

Republican citizenship:

  • she examines not the structure, but the individual within it
  • artificial, equality is not universal but man made
  • spatial, people can see and touch each other, attending public events
  • private/public distinction

Arendt is a civic republican

  • pro private/public, just anti retreating into the private sphere
  • not liberal, since she outright states what a good life is (rather than letting people decide on their own)
  • politics goes beyond pure instrumentality, it gives life splendor

Rawls: agrees with republicanism, but not Arendt, grand meaning must be left for the private life

TOCQUEVILLE:

  • federal republican organization allows for many power centers

She is not fond of the idea of human rights - we have civic rights, but not universal human ones

  • a state realizes our rights, human rights are an outcome of this
  • your right to have rights is state-dependent
  • if there was a worldwide polity there’d be human rights, but now there’s only civic ones

weird take on Eisenhower’s anti-segregation reforms, where the schools are private life and should be left apart from politics