HISTORY OF EUROPEAN COLONIZATION 15:
Obsession with the exotic nude (on sexuality)
- TAHITI & BALI: characterized by beautiful women by westerners
- use of pictures to sexualize oppressed women
- Victorian era: oppressed European sexuality
- nakedness was understood as openness to sex, etc. Women walked around with their breasts out for cultural reasons.
- Polygamy - also understood as ‘primitive’
RELATIONS (centered around the MALE):
relations were homogenized and regulated
- many colonizers: bachelors. more dispensible, women could develop trade relations, break from social structures, children may become ‘sickly’, theyre harder to transport, etc.
- Bachelors: start relations with local women
- toleration of extramarital relations: Java, Sumatra, Indochina. Men stay in better health.
- colonial women: fewer financial/emotional demands; useful as guides/domestic servers
- relations with local women is better than prostitution or homosexuality
Legal Dimension: VOC selected only male bachelors for over 200 years. Local women couldn’t travel back to the metropole with their husbands (even with thier kids). In India: for first 3 years of their stay in the colony, men couldn’t marry. Indies Civil Code: women have 0 right over mixed race kids.
Consequences:
- local women dependent on European colonizer men
- local men now compete with ‘superior’ Europeans
- mixed race children (too white and not white enough)
Belgian metis children (kidnapped form the Congo)
Late 19th Century:
- women are introduced into the colonies (technological advancements)
- colonies become more segregated (housing, compounds, dress codes, social taboos - these were relatively new)
- this was done to ‘protect’ women. This was done by males, not women themselves, they were afraid of the sexuality of black men.
- militias, rifle clubs (to protect wives from indigenous men), stricter rape laws, but they’re race-specific (white man - black woman sexual abuse is ignored; black man - white woman sexual abuse is punished severly)
MISSIONARIES [this is the professor’s field of research]:
- CHRONOLOGY:
14th Century: China & India
St. Francis Xavier (1550s) - from Lisbon to East Africa, India, Japan, China, Goa (Portugese India)
15th Century: Christianity in Congo (Jao of Congo is Chritianized); Kongo Kingdom later gives up Christianity
18TH CENTURY (enlightenment):
- Decline in the 18th Century (Missionary activity & Christianity)
- The Enlightenment lead to less mission work, even the Jesuits were abolished from 1773-1814
- BRITISH INDIA (1750-60 main era of colonial expansion) - missionaries banned in BI until 1830. Brits there are more fascinated with local culture, with Indian religion, language and philosophy. Instead of suppression of local culture, there was a desire to learn about it (IT WAS UP TO BRITS TO LEARN LOCAL LANGUAGE, NOT UP TO INDIANS TO LEARN ENGLISH); indirect rule, no shift in political structures
- Gentoo Laws: gentile + hindu law
- Rousseau’s Noble Savage (savage is noble, i.e. untouched by EU influences, like a beautiful innocent child)
19TH CENTURY (new paradigm; civilization):
- Christianity popular again; Romanticism; new congregations
- New missionary activities due to commerce, due to free trade
- before: monopoly, control; now: free trade, free movement, more freedom for missionaries
- Abolitionism (end of slavery); new goals boost missionary actions
- End of fascination with local cultures; newfound ideas of superiority in Social Darwinism (no longer noble, but underdeveloped)
- 1810s; British India: English slowly imposed on the elites (language, morality, etc.); English language colleges;
- 1835: English replaces Persian as official language in BI
- Fight against ‘barbaric customs’ (Sati women; Thuggs/Thuggee who kill travelers in the name of Kali)
- 1813: Missionaries allowed in BI; fighting barbarism, spreading English, spreading weastern Victorian culture, etc.
- A lot of Belgian missionaries (not important to know these names):
Placide Tempels (Congo); Raphael Ryhove (Congo); Pieter-Jan De Smet (America); Franz Van De Velde (Canada); Pertrus Vertenten (Papa Nu Guinea); Paul Goethals (British India); Marie-Louise De Meester (??) - Congo most important colony for Belgian missionaries; British India is also important for Belgian missionaries; colonies divided by religious boundaries
New Catholic Institutions: - Society for the Propagation of Faith, France
- Scheut, Belgium (established by Verbiste): China, Inner Mongolia, Philippines, Congo…
- White Fathers, France: Algiers, Congo
New Protestant Institutions also come about
[we don’t need to know these names] - also female congregations (sisters, nuns);
Chinese Fransiscan nuns, native people accepted - They built churches, chapels, cathedrals, monestaries, villages, etc.
- SOCIAL WORK: hospitals, leper houses, dispensaries (open air pharmacy), orphanages, beggars’ homes, vagrant colonies
- they help people in bad positions for 2 reasons: because of Christian religious thinking, but ALSO, because poorer people are easier to convert (not purely selfless reasons)
- missionaries also do research (ethonography, dictionaries, linguistics); they educate people (schools); printing and publishing ventures (religious propaganda)
- in Congo: only primary education; in British India: desire to create elite, but ignoring the masses
Important questions: - Was the effect positive?: 1. No, white superiority. 2. Yes, helpful and compassionate. Over 20th Century the approach changed greatly.
- Monologue or dialogue? Eurocentric worldview was taught in schools. Local culture effected greatly.
Colonizing work or not? Partially, yes.