ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY 2: HERACLITUS

HERACLITUS:

  • enigmatic, word plays
  • noble, left throne to brother, many such likely fictitious stories
  • reality is self-regulating and structure-maintaining

LOGOS [Fr. 1]:

  • all things happen according to it
  • word, account, reason, speech, structure, proportion, ratio, law
    [later - rational or lawful structure]
  • deep hidden structure of reality, alternating opposites

River and Sameness [Fr. 12]:

  • River is same due to different rivers flowing through it
  • flow is necessary for stability, identity
  • this can refer to us, those who step into the river

All is One [Fr. 10]:

  • unity because opposites need each other (hot & cold)

Conflict & Opposition [Fr. 51]:

  • tension is required for existence (like the bow)

War [Fr. 53]:

  • strife is justice, all things act due to strife and necessity
  • Homer: war is common because all participate in it; Heraclitus: war is common because its the universal structure of reality
  • other presoc: universal principles limit the chaos of war; Heraclitus: chaos of war is that principle
  • reality is self-regulating and self-opposing

Fire:

  • fire is Logos’ material aspect
  • destroys, nourished by destruction, the becoming of logos, reinvention of the self
  • it is, however, only logos-like, a material counterpart to it

Novelty:

  • reality as cyclical becoming
  • conflict justifies itself, has its own reason
    [Plato - Heraclitus seeks stability, not becoming]

The Soul:

  • first to speak of a P/A-like soul, the human knowledge-soul
  • before everything was animated
  • not immortal, river-like personal identity
  • we unique have the capacity to decide upon our destiny

His Project:

  • presocratics see change everywhere in nature
    [Anaximander - things change because the pay the penalty of separation from Aperion]
    [Pythagoreans - instability, reality is made of limit, shape number]
  • Reality is not justified by something self-same that subverts this changing, but is this change itself
  • intrinsic order within change itself
  • no need for external principles to justify change, change is principle-sufficient
  • relation between opposites is the order [happiness-sadness, death-life, the world emerges from these relations]
  • the Logos that goes along with the flow
  • reality is not chaos, but its ordering is not transcendent