Proving this is a wff (well-formed formula)

¬((P ∨ Q) ∧ ¬(¬Q ∨ R))

P, Q, and R are all wffs (atomic propositions are all wffs)

P ∨ Q is a wff.

¬(¬Q ∨ R)

0, 0 0
1, 0 1
0, 1 0
1, 1 0

Q ∧ ¬R

¬((P ∨ Q) ∧ (Q ∧ ¬R))

every WFF must have a unique parse tree.
I.e. P ∨ Q ∧ R is not a WFF does not have a unique parse tree